| #1 TheRubberDucky (dfiatx100-044.dsl.gtei.net)[6506] |
|
Yes. Let us ALL hail terran.
TERRANS OWN :] (Excluding times when I am playing vs them as toss/zerg) |
| #2 TheRubberDucky (dfiatx100-044.dsl.gtei.net)[6507] |
|
Yes. Let us ALL hail terran.
TERRANS OWN :] (Excluding times when I am playing vs them as toss/zerg) |
| #3 2Inadequate (57.chicago-13-14rs.il.dial-access.att.net)[6518] |
|
| Probably the only other way to crack this dood was to go BC, but nukes were more cost-effective, and a hellova lot kooler =) Has ne1 noticed the severe decline in BC usage and the incredible increase in carrier usage? Just wondering. |
| #4 Flint79 (ns1.interlinks.net)[6520] |
|
Yeah...I was thinkin BC as well. But, I had nukes and BC would take too long to build. I think the reason for the lack of BC lately is A) The cost and time to build b) The fact that BC's can either make you or break you. BC's are big supply whore and one or two plauge(s) can send you packing. I play Vanilla...so plauge is even more of a bitch.
If I really had mucho expansions going and could make 3 or 4 BC at the same time (And keep making at the same rate after that)...I would consider it. I would also use em to crack turtles on Islands if need be. Last time I made mass BC was VS a Toss newbie about 3 weeks ago. I did it just for fun :). Your right though...the nukes were much more cost effective. |
| #5 HolyAnarchy{GK} (spider-tn061.proxy.aol.com)[6530] |
|
Flint! Where you been, man?
Mail me |
| #6 Mark4 (1Cust130.tnt3.rdu1.da.uu.net)[6532] |
|
| I nearly cried when I saw you didn't have any nuke pictures at the end =[ |
| #7 Flint79 (ns1.interlinks.net)[6535] |
|
| I know. I'm quite upset about it myself :( |
Home
Forum
Starcraft Tournaments
