| #1 Nathan Brazil (ip245.chicago25.il.pub-ip.psi.net)[6032] |
|
I'm sorry for putting 3 up there, but I kept hitting back on my browser because I wanted images and I had to read the directions again! SORRY!! To bad I didn't want the images because the program I have is shareware and the whole image is blanketed with a damn COMPANY LOGO! SO sorry.
-Nathan |
| #2 MikeyMonty (spider-wl061.proxy.aol.com)[6053] |
|
| Good report, very good writing. Just next time add a few pics. Keep writing. |
| #3 Hawke (stj246.nf.sympatico.ca)[6179] |
|
Good BR. Use pictures, and use the positions as if on a clock. 12
9 3
6 :) |
| #4 dislekcia (netcash.is.co.za)[6711] |
|
Hmmm, I really like that positions idea... works better than the clock method (ppl use that because they're used to it more than anything else), if you think about it: You're using a grid system, and almost anywhere on the map can be easily referred to by simply using 2 numbers. All the normal spots are covered by single digits, and you don't have to get into the 1:30's and stuff... plus you can be really accurate because you've got over 25 points to refer to. Add the fact that it's in a simple to use package that is physically similar to the layout of the map, and it's almost perfect...
Damn useful. |