Battlereports.com your home for Starcraft Home Forum Starcraft Tournaments

"Did anyone notice that that Bob The Newt logo looks like a man with an extremely large penis?"
-SqueakyMonkey




#1 Desert Demon[152437]
user-0ce2kbh.cable.mindspring.com
Ack first.
#2 [152438]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
approved
#3 [152439]
usrns94.dialup.hawaii.edu
That was fast Dag. =o

It never fails though, everytime I submit a report I discover errors and have to repair the report.

#4 Desert Demon[152440]
user-0ce2kbh.cable.mindspring.com
That is one trippy lookin' game.

I'm too tired to coherently read though...*writes it on his to-do list*

#5 wakiki[152444]
cable-66-191-155-146.mtv.al.charter.com
5
#6 badme[152445]
pcp05314423pcs.norstn01.pa.comcast.net
6, Hey, it's Pocket Tanks!
#7 Shuriken[152447]
ool-182e1a3b.dyn.optonline.net
looks good man
#8 [152450]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
oh btw, next time just approve the br yourself, obviously it isn't spam ;).

Looks good, I'll rate later.

#9 Chris[152451]
astound-66-234-209-235.ca.astound.net
This shit was around before any of us were born I think.
#10 Chris[152452]
astound-66-234-209-235.ca.astound.net
4 by the way for a less than stellar game. I didn't like it. :-/
#11 [152457]
c-24-8-188-140.client.comcast.net
Wow, I remember playing this game.

Anyway, nice report, needed to be longer however. I give this a seven, and desire more.

#12 .Praetor[152461]
c-67-172-163-127.client.comcast.net
Yeah. I actually have to agree on the report not being on a good game. (I like scorch, but that was kind of short and the graphics looked even worse than the original.) Oh, and it's spelled 'banner'.
#13 .Praetor[152462]
c-67-172-163-127.client.comcast.net
AIM me to play if you ever see me on :)
#14 [152464]
usrns47.dialup.hawaii.edu
.Praetor:
You're never on. =P

I only really BRed this because I made the effort to get the pics and it was a waste of effort to just delete them. Printscreen button -> Paste in Photoshop. Not worth doing again.

Basically the game makes BR-ing difficult, just trying to get players together. I wouldn't know what the original looked like though.




#15 .Praetor[152466]
c-67-172-163-127.client.comcast.net
True. *Puts AIM in startup folder*
#16 mick[152469]
bri-pow-pr2.tpgi.com.au
haha Scorched Earth was good times
#17 [152472]
user-12l2ep3.cable.mindspring.com
There's nothing wrong with putting up a quick and dirty report, especially when its on a cool game like Scorched Earth. Even if the report wasn't long, it had some decent writing and pics and brought back some old Scorched Earth memories for me.

I'm going to rate this a 7.7, rounding up to 8 because I enjoy reports on new games, and especially one that I played 10 years ago on my 486!

#18 Some_God[152475]
ool-18b8c5a0.dyn.optonline.net
Dude this game looks like a rip-off of Tank Wars... *sigh*
#19 BlueRibbon[152477]
65.167.44.45
I remember making a report with the title being "Who's lightning will strike first?" and got a load of shit about it being Whose. Has anyone ever told you that your name is grammatically wrong?

Anyway I think your report was subpar compared to your other ones. Your Laser Squad Nemesis reports were great and so was the last Footy Frenzy one. But this game just looks like it got ran over by a truck a few too many times. Your writing, that was aimed at describing the action, was good as usual. But I still don't know much about the game. It looks weird. I look forward to your next non-Scorched Earth report.

6.5 (I can't give you the boost based on bringing back memories because I have never play this :P)



#20 Desert Demon[152478]
user-0ce2kbh.cable.mindspring.com
Isn't it a contraction of "Who has?"

Like "who has got lag? I do."

Or something.



#21 LameJoker[152479]
pool-129-44-10-204.alb.east.verizon.net
OMG I forgot how much fun this game was, thx for reminding me about it.
#22 [152481]
62.103.182.31
Ah, the greatness that is scorched earth, i have spent ungodly amount of time on the old dos version of this game playing with friends. It's just so fun when you have a bunch of people playing this in the same room.

A 6 because i wasnt much moved by the writing and found the layout (like your last report) too painful for my eyes to bear for long.

#23 mattzarella[152483]
162.7.33.65.cfl.rr.com
who's - who is

so this leads me to believe that WGL is black

WHO IS GOT LAG? I DO


#24 Desert Demon[152484]
user-0ce2kbh.cable.mindspring.com
"Who's been to Boston?"

Who is been to Boston? I think not.

^_^
#25 BlueRibbon[152485]
65.167.44.18
According to the dictionary, Who's means both 'Who is' and 'Who has.' So everyone, including senor WGL is right :D.
#26 Some_God[152486]
ool-18b8c5a0.dyn.optonline.net
P...P...P.. Pwnage. :O
#27 Desert Demon[152487]
user-0ce2kbh.cable.mindspring.com
Maybe we're all wrong...

Okay I won't start that.
#28 Chris[152489]
astound-66-234-209-235.ca.astound.net
Grammar
#29 BlackTerror[152490]
pcp04981570pcs.catonv01.md.comcast.net
I played a BASIC game involving giant apes on top of buildings hurling bananas at each other. I think it came with BASIC or something.

I know I played it before 1993, too. I mean, sheesh, Doom came out in 1993! I must have played it in the Catacombs 3D era or earlier.
#30 mick[152493]
bri-pow-pr2.tpgi.com.au
bananatron, sunvabich
#31 [152494]
62.103.239.94
BlackTerror if im not mistaken the giant ape game came with qbasic at dos 5, im not sure if it existed in earlier dos versions. -.-
#32 [152495]
usrns11.dialup.hawaii.edu
Not bananatron, Gorilla. Its in the artillery game history site I posted earlier. They include a link to the-underdogs where you can download it if you want to.
#33 [152496]
usrns11.dialup.hawaii.edu
article, not site. =o
#34 [152498]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
lol I played that ape game too . . . ugh.
#35 Shuriken[152503]
ool-182e1a3b.dyn.optonline.net
omfg pocket tanks ownz my bonez
#36 [152506]
67.176.104.160
hey does this count as a rater party?
#37 [152522]
129.142.195.30.ip.tele2adsl.dk
Yep. Bring out the Ouzo.
#38 [152553]
wc01.wlfdle.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com
Let's roll out the naked chicks too.

"Mattz . . . get in here!"
#39 kane[152555]
c-67-170-196-151.client.comcast.net
what on earth? who rated this an 8?

this is barely a 6
#40 kane[152556]
c-67-170-196-151.client.comcast.net
oh, it was JV. thinks he can give ratings just because he coded and created everything on this site. frickin arrogant.
#41 [152557]
CPE00080d371d83-CM00080d371c83.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
actually I rather liked this br :O
#42 [152572]
usrns54.dialup.hawaii.edu
Something else to celebrate, this is my highest commented report now.
#43 TwistedNecro[152617]
lsanca1-ar54-4-3-202-139.lsanca1.dsl-verizon.net
lol

I played the game. Boring to me. I suck at those types of games (and I don't like em either), even tho Worms was sorta fun (except that I lost every time I played...
#44 wakiki[155095]
cable-68-113-117-177.mtv.al.charter.com
Heh, my "5" comment was saying that I was the fifth. Not that I thought the report was five worthy :D I liked it.



Post a comment of your own here




You are not cleared to post comments, because we don't know you're not a spambot!

To comment, please Verify yourself now. [Requires cookies!]







Back to the Battle Report