Battlereports.com your home for Starcraft Home Forum Starcraft Tournaments

"good for me that I have storm and he not :)"
-Necrosausage!




#1 Ling-erie[89568]
click-cl4-cache7.ilford.mdip.bt.net
Again sorry for shit image quality, but the reading should be better than my first, so i hope you enjoy it.
#2 CKane[89573]
c209662-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com
...another one?
#3 CKane[89574]
c209662-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com
First non-author on both reports. :p
#4 CKane[89575]
c209662-a.haywd2.sfba.home.com
Ownage!
#5 [AsF]AzNSuNBoY[89583]
AC99758C.ipt.aol.com
Nice :)

CKane stop spamming

#6 derek[89587]
AC923FE5.ipt.aol.com
10
#7 y0urg0d[89588]
px3nr.wp.shawcable.net
Nice report. You even spelled centre correctly =D
#8 Ling-erie[89592]
click-cl4-cache7.ilford.mdip.bt.net
Thanx pple, will give u one you don't have to squint 2 c the images for next time =P, CKane, your medal is being engraved as we speak (j/k thanx)
#9 KingJamesXXX[89630]
st401a.mckenna.edu
Great report, but AAARRGGGHH!!! I thought from the title that it might actually be possible for terran to beat toss on Temple! You are a whore for getting my hopes up and then dashing them so cruelly. :) Great job on the report - your writing was excellent and your pictures added a lot. And WTF was up with that wall-in?! I saw it and thought the game was over.
I hope you write more in the future.

JIM


#10 AkumaSpawn[89641]
164.58.10.122
Both BRs= gosu+

I'm guessing 7 at the very least, more appopriately an 8.

#11 Ling-erie[89665]
igw-se.astra.com
Thanx JIM, *head swells with pride* I hoped the title would mess with your mind, but i can asure you that Terran can own Toss on Temple, especially when i'm Toss!
#12 unVytae[89693]
px3ht.ok.wave.shaw.ca
WTF is a Hula Hoop Crisp? anyways,good report!
#13 monkey bob[89695]
c193.150.239.42.cm-upc.chello.se
Keep up the good work!(or not, its you to decide)
#14 TheVictim[89727]
155.176.112.88
Great game, I love it when the tide of battle sways back and forth, and then WHAM. Great BR of a great game!



#15 Ling-erie[89729]
click-cl4-cache3.ilford.mdip.bt.net
Thanks people, and whoever rated these two HOW ARE THEY THE SAME??????? This was 1-2 points better than the other one, and they both get 7's..... Ah sorry, i know u know what u're looking for and all so i won't flame, but this was a better gamer than the other, perhaps 7= fair for the style etc and crappy pics, but imbalance i cry, the rating is imbalanced (oo i'm Zileas all of a sudden) RRRRRRAAAAAAAA
#16 Supercod[89745]
vdslppp129.sttl.uswest.net
GJ... Carriers, anyone?
That deserved more than a 7
#17 iggy[89753]
adsl-64-160-24-74.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net
a solid 8 report

- 128 for being a total moron whenever i talk to u

so -120

gw thx





#18 outsider[89790]
AC961C2A.ipt.aol.com
iggy = idiot :[ gw thx


this was nice and better then the first one...id say 8 or 9..especially if the first got a 7 ^^


#19 ScottyFine[89822]
205.232.211.5
Bravo on the report! i give it a 9....whats up with no air units in this game...a few scouts would of taken out the tanks with ease...i also didnt see any turrets.
#20 Ling-erie[89823]
igw-se.astra.com
NO TURRETS?!?!?!?! NO TURRETS!??!!?!?
So who put Bob the Obs down to low Hitpoints then???

Seriously though, neither side really needed them until about the last attack of the game, both were doing ok without. I have a feeling (i didn't hear the pre-game chat) that this was a pre-agreed no air goon v metal matchup, although i have no idea really since QuickSilver01's BO was a typical anti-random build (pylon-gate-gate-pylon-gas-core)..... Well, i guess we'll never know, and Let_Me_Win!!! can't even remember playing the game (it was in January) so he doesn't know either, and i've never seen QuickSilver01 since...

Sorry




#21 CarrierMan[89939]
cf2.mcl.starband.net
What the fuck do u mean, "neither side needed air units"?! The terran bastard would have been dead a LOT sooner if protoss had carriers. What kind of an idiot tries to counter tanks with goons? Look at it this way, pal. One scout > 15 tanks. 10 carriers > any number of tanks. So "no air needed" MY ASS!!!!!!
#22 Ling-erie[89953]
igw-se.astra.com
He won without carriers, thus he didn't need them, somple as that. They may have sped it up a little, ended the game sooner etc, but in re-directing the resources he used on goons/temp/zeals to carrier production, he would have possibly lost in the gap where he had less units, AND, the Terran was at 3:3 ground units and scouted well, so if carriers had come, he'd have had 3:3 goliaths to counter them whilst the carriers would be 0:0 or at most 1:1. Carriers may have helped end it sooner, but he didn't NEED them as he won without them. Trust me, at the pace of that matchup, carrier expendature would have ruined him and been gg to Terran! I saw the game, and i know!
#23 CaptA2k[90055]
AC962650.ipt.aol.com
Really good report, do more!
#24 :+:SlipKnoT:+:[91625]
bc-kam-a53-01-44.look.ca
Nice work yo
#25 Ghrind[91680]
ACB51C30.ipt.aol.com
great report. easy 8. pics were nice and reading was good too. i kno this is a comment section of a br but T > P =[ and carriers = a waste cuz golies hurt alot vs carriers (and no gayweb is only for newbs)
keep up the good work though ling! hope to see more
#26 BloodFists[91765]
cx730813-b.alsv1.occa.home.com
8-9 i think a rater woke up on the wrong side of the bed :[
#27 Plague[91792]
bing179.hughes.binghamton.edu
ya, 7 is too little
#28 +AnathemA+[92244]
phnxdslgw9poolC34.phnx.uswest.net
maybe the other one deserved a 3 or a 4, or this one deserved a 6, or just maybe you shouldn't whine about gold when this report was entirely average.



Post a comment of your own here




You are not cleared to post comments, because we don't know you're not a spambot!

To comment, please Verify yourself now. [Requires cookies!]







Back to the Battle Report