"this would be halfway interesting and funny if the whole fake cybersex thing wasn't so played out already." -Keanu_Reaver
|
| #1 Kamile[1999] | | | Don't worry, your not only one who's played my little game =) | | #2 Mark4[2011] | | | Rock me! Now that's high quality entertainment. | | #3 BadGuy(tm)[2014] | | In all honesty, those carriers are the ultimate 'tank rush' units of Starcraft. Yeah yeah they cost a lot. Yeah yeah, they can be mind controlled. Yeah yeah, they are slow. Yeah yeah, once you kill the 3-4 observers that come with them your single surviving wraith can take out the shields on one of them... before more observers come over.
If I were in your position of expansion grabbing, I'd try to defeat the enemy with spellcasters / special ability units alone, instead of massing carriers, dragoons and whatnot - it's more challenging this way.
In my never humble opinion it doesn't make much to win a game with such a super unit once you have money pouring out of every hole in your body. :) So there. | | #4 ralessi[2029] | | MY TANK RUSH OWNZZZZZ YES!!!
hehehehehe | | #5 Bob the Newt[2038] | | | If the other players let you have money pouring out of every hole in your body then they have lost. Expanding is needed, and stopping expansion is just as needed. And as for carriers, much like everything else in the game, they can get taken down by anyone who knows they're coming (lockdown, plague, psi storm, mind control, scourges, scouts, dmatrixed cruisers, devourers, goliaths, but not valks). | | #6 patheto[3060] | | One thing I don't understand:
Why would ANYONE, even the most dim-witted of all morons(YES, Bill Gates), want to have valks against carriers? Is there anything I missed about carriers? They have 4 armour, don't they? So why? |
Back to the Battle Report
|
|