Battlereports.com your home for Starcraft Home Forum Starcraft Tournaments

"How about we start discussing my Small Game Hunters now?
I found it halirious when I got the same type of response every time I play on it.
"Hey I hardly have any minerals left. Are you sure this is BGH$$$?"
"Hey I got jipped!"
"U C*CK-SUC*ING AS*HOLE U CHANGE THE MAP MOTHE*FU**KER!!!!"
-[FLS]Prozerran




#1 Matrisking[79321]
pacific17-165.infoserv.uakron.edu
Submit report... take 2...and... action! There, i just screwed the fileread thing and copy-pasted the HTML like any normal person would. Sorry bout the previous post : remember, first person to comment (other than this) gets that "big" prize :D

MatrisKing

#2 mattkid[79323]
00-60-97-d5-1d-d0.bconnected.net
what prize??
#3 mattkid[79324]
00-60-97-d5-1d-d0.bconnected.net
=]
#4 Matrisking[79325]
pacific17-165.infoserv.uakron.edu
lol matt u obviously didnt read my report :P guess u will just have to read the whole thing to find out :D That is all.

MatrisKing

#5 Loser[79326]
proxy1-external.rchmd1.bc.home.com
Better, much better
#6 Frost[79327]
spider-mtc-ta012.proxy.aol.com
Very goof for your first report, id say 6-7. I excpect to see more from you. Maybe a couple more SS's.
#7 znzf[79328]
24.65.81.66.on.wave.home.com
the first one was funnier
=D
#8 Eradicate~Me[79329]
spider-wd071.proxy.aol.com
this is more than a 6-7, prolly a 9
#9 random average player[79330]
dialup-209.244.135.16.Providence1.Level3.net
i c potential in u
pictures were very good, story was descriptive, smaller text otherwise gj 7
#10 wtf[79331]
spider-mtc-tc072.proxy.aol.com
um. at least a 9

the writing was excellent btw
and the pics were top notch, although a bit too fuzzy


#11 PsiKilla[79333]
edtn005234.hs.telusplanet.net
I agree, 8-9 for this report.

-Psi

#12 the()vermind[79343]
user-2ive66r.dialup.mindspring.com
time to evaluate a newbie reporter who will get a better rating than all of the reports i've ever done under my two names. Great br, nothing bad about that. Range is 7-10, I give 9
#13 MatrisKing[79349]
pacific72-220.infoserv.uakron.edu
Heh thanx everyoen for yer opinions/commments/criticizm. Just so u know frost, I intentionally kept the screen shot count as low as possible, only using then when I felt that it was too hard to describe in text, thus minimizing the DL time for the few people like me on a 56K but only connects at 28 : hehe thanx again, that is all.

MatrisKing

#14 TerranTurtle[79378]
modem-116.walden.fcc.net
Heh heh, Wesley Willis...Birdman kicked my ass!!
#15 Lunatikk[79381]
ci898345-a.ruthfd1.tn.home.com
Good report but for the love of god man, smaller text!
#16 MatrisKing[79382]
atlantic07-148.infoserv.uakron.edu
Hey, yeah i just learned that on some browsers it displays the text as massively huge. For those of you that are getting REALLY big text, are you using IE or Netscape? I use IE and its fine for me. please post the comment here or e-mail me at matrisking@Hotmail.com so I can fix this for my next report. That is all,

MatrisKing

#17 'Bengalaas'[79387]
2Cust141.tnt1.reno.nv.da.uu.net
9- 10
Easy
6-7 is bullshit
this better get gold
Writing was solid, Pictures were excellent
Gw man, I look forward to seeing more reports from you..






#18 [79403]
208.196.35.239
Not bad, but I don't think toss had much of a shot here. Interesting format though, and I thought the GIFs were pretty cool. Text was a bit big and I use IE 5. I'd go with a point smaller next time.

6

Cheers,
Dref




#19 [79404]
208.196.35.239
Hmm, I'll expound on that a bit cuz I see that some people wanted this report to be gold.

The reason I gave it a six was because toss got beatdown pretty bad. His economy got hurt early, he got outexpanded, he never attacked any of the zerg bases, and by looking at the minimaps, I would guess that he never got past 3 gate production, even in the late game.

The mediocrity of play was what disappointed me the most about this report. The writing and presentation were done well.

Cheers,
Dref





#20 MatrisKing[79406]
pacific28-176.infoserv.uakron.edu
::sigh:: the reason I wrote this report as a story rather than a straight up report was because the game wasnt that great. Once I realized that the protoss were failing to uh.... be decent, I thought I wouldnt report unless they startd to do better. This didnt happen, but it was at this time that I realized that the way the battle was going, it really did look like a battle over the temple itself, especially the way that the huge 3 prong battle mostly took place right on or around the temple. It was then that I decided that, it might not make a good report, but it could make an excellent story, which is why I concentrated so much effort on the storyline. I did realize that, along the lines of gameplay, it was really sorry, but hey ive seen some bad battles that got at least 8's before so I figured that this as a story alone would have the potential to succeed. That is all.

MatrisKing
#21 MatrisKing[79411]
pacific21-169.infoserv.uakron.edu
U probably should put something like that on the "reporting guides" section about that or at least give a little mercy to a first timer.

Actually I wanna expound a little bit too...
The only gripes I have heard before dref was smaller text. Dref brought up the point that the game was poor too... which, as i explained, is true. But, how can you rate my skill as a reporter so much just based on the game that I did? Especially when I attempted to work around that in attempts to make something that would have a little more plot than the average report? 6.... rather low doncha think? Especially considering that its my first report, I spent TONS of time working on the images, improving the format, and writing a semi-decent story? I mean taking off 3 1/2 points just for a krappy story and 1/2 point for large text... wow. For some reason I thought people would look at the quality of the report itself, the images, the use of text, etc. I dunno, maybe I'm missing something, but I thought that my text and images and story were higher than that. I forgot to put a "lessons learned" section at the end but I think I already learned one: Time and effort are meaningless, making a story is meaningless, only if it is a GOOD GAME will you get a decent rating.

Drawesome.... great reporter... does a choose your own adventure. No actual game even took place, there were no players at all, he made up a story. He got all 10's. Dont get me wrong, I back this up wholeheartedly, he deserved 10's without question, but its just proving that you can have a high quality piece of writing without a report. Say there was no actual game, and I just made all of that up, a story about how the zerg overran the temple, and then continued to talk about how the terran arrived and stuff, then it would be a different case right? Since itsj ust a story? Mayhaps it would be a little more exciting then? J/w. That is all

Matrisking

<i>"Pound the feeble..."</i> -311
#22 [79414]
208.196.35.239
I, as all raters, rate on one criteria alone. That criteria is "how much I enjoy the report". The post I pointed you to was simply a description of what I enjoy in a report. This may differ from rater to rater and Fox may come along and give you a 9.

I do enjoy "funny or unusual" reports as I mentioned in the post I linked you to. However, in this particular instance, the meat of the report (the battle between toss and zerg) was a beatdown and the story was not all that engrossing.

Part of your rating as a battlereporter should come from your ability to report materiel that is interesting to readers such as myself. I agree, it does take a long time to write text and edit screenshots and combine it all into a presentable HTML document. I've done it many times myself. I can appreciate your effort. However, keep in mind that I'm not rating you on your effort, I'm rating you on your materiel. In this case, I thought the materiel was enjoyable enough to merit you a six.

Cheers,
Dref
#23 MatrisKing[79421]
pacific21-169.infoserv.uakron.edu
Funny how you never read anything about that in the "reporting guides" or maybe you do and i just missed it, either way it would be useful to know that BEFORE wasting hours on end of tedious work to bring people the best you can. That is all

MatrisKing
#24 [79425]
208.196.35.239
I don't think it was a waste. You have a lot of positive comments up there. A lot of people liked your report. Ignore me, I'm just a stupid rater... :P

Dref
#25 DrAwesome[79432]
PPP-155-2.va.sprint-hsd.net
well I showed up a little late for the whole argument, but, I for one, completely disagree with this rating. When I read this I looked for more than a good game. As a semi-fiction report, I was enjoying the style and the story. A 6, way too low. As a fiction type report, there was a lot here to look at other than the physical game.

Matris, don't get down, just keep em coming. I, for one, will look forward to more.

8.5-9
DrAwesome
#26 RaZaGhAx[79454]
cx55467-a.irvn1.occa.home.com
MatrisKing, this is what you have to consider. Do people just read BRs to see a gosu SC player beatdown someone who just learned how to tech to tanks? (A little exaggeration but you know what I mean)

Senior, reports aren't made to make people "oooh" and "aaah" over graphics. They're there for humor. They're there to learn strategies. They're there for entertainment. Of course, graphics are a plus. They're great eyecandy for the reader...but don't forget what the viewer is actually reading your BR for ;]. DrAwesome's was more of a fiction than a BR. That's a completely different field of rating.

Anyway...GL in the future :]

RaZ
#27 Illgetdroped[79460]
63.210.217.71
well i dont think this should be 9 but more then 6.... at 7 or hardly 8, and u should rate this as of how good the br is made not whether u like it or not.. or u like or dont like the author...
#28 WarLeaderJustin[79467]
spider-th024.proxy.aol.com
Who cares about ratings; just know a lot of other people thought you should get high, so have some self-esteem that a great number of people thought your report to be great. Now to read ;)
#29 WarLeaderJustin[79468]
spider-th024.proxy.aol.com
That was pretty good, but still a beatdown. I'd give it an 8.
#30 Cearas[79473]
proxy-02.pe.iqnet.net.au
Wow, I would have killed myself had the toss not won that one. BR was nicely presented, the game was lacking though. I would have given this a 7.
#31 Matrisking[79477]
pacific19-167.infoserv.uakron.edu
Heh well thanx for the tips everyone, its good to know that my actual report was pretty good, next time ill be sure that its one helluve game before I do a br on it. That is all.

MatrisKing
#32 Robert Frazer[79486]
frazers.demon.co.uk
hmmm.....

Even though Drefsab claims that the battles were mediocre, I believed that they were quite well detailed given the circumstances. You also presented the report well. It deserved better than a 6.

-Robert Frazer-
"Wise brother Beltane, my thoughts eactly!"
#33 AtomicOsis...[79515]
1Cust154.tnt2.reno.nv.da.uu.net
Wow, DrefSab you're an idiot....
8-9-10
The game was fine, the pictures and writing made up for it.
Giving this a 6 is like telling you, your Fanfics are good.
#34 testosterone[79522]
mkc-65-26-143-252.kc.rr.com
its all about standards, i think it is great dref is rating harder along with fox, a 6 report is above average, which this was, 8-10 should be for really exceptional reports not just daily stuff......just mho
#35 [79524]
63.220.230.229
This report was uneven. The cute little pics were good. the action was average. The writing was a little dull. The actual sentence structure and so forth struck me as a bit awkward, and the story really didn't grab me. Still, not a <i>bad>/i> piece of work. But not spectacular. 7
#36 Monty Pylon[79525]
gateway.Culinary.EDU
Dref was right in the fact that the flash and flare was to cover a bad game. As I read the report I watch as purple swarmed the map with little to no resistence by orange. Your story text was way to big and it took away from the report itself. BRing a bad game is not a good idea because it is the main point of the BR. Reading a bad game is like watching a bad movie. Even if the special effects are good you still are mad because you had to sit through an pay for a bad movie. ex:Battlefield Earth, Water World, Jar Jar Binks

You have good potential and your bubbles and humor was very amusing. Keep writing but be sure to pick a better game to report.


Damn the man, save the empire!
Monty Pylon
#37 [79526]
63.220.230.229
Frickin tags.
#38 Monty Pylon[79527]
gateway.Culinary.EDU
I no this is probably a coiniceince, but your temple holing incredible power for the toss and the zerg after it sounds a hell of a like my chronicle story. I think it was number four on the list. Just a thought.
#39 +AnathemA+[79531]
phnxdslgw9poolC110.phnx.uswest.net
hey drefy, gj linking ppl to this mediocre br with a lot of whiney comments. bottom line, dref was right in that he said "how much I enjoy the report" is how he measures brs. how else should he do it? based on effort? awarding anything based on effort is garbage and you'd agree with me if you weren't bitter about his rating.
#40 Monty Pylon[79532]
gateway.Culinary.EDU
Damn shame the whinning worked. What's next? A recount?!!
#41 Sexy^Orangutang[79534]
spider-we022.proxy.aol.com
I know this is about 20 comments away from the argument, but after reading it I have one thing to say to Matrisking: Ratings dont mean that much. Its impossible to get a rater to change the rating so after its given to you, please don't bitch about it.

Anyways, the report was decent and, going by Dref's rating system I'd give it a 7 since it entertained me a bit, but thats my opinion. Oh and report a better game next time.

Good Job
#42 [LoR]-Punisher[79544]
202.156.0.2
Its a good report but i prefer the text to be smaller.Pics were good.
#43 MatrisKing[79551]
huron84-84.comp.uakron.edu
Hey everyone,
Monty Pylon: I am pretty new to this site and havent had the time to read every report by ever person yet. I've heard enough "recount" jokes to last me a lifetime thanx so you should probably waste them on someone that thought it was funny in the first place.
Anathem: Yes you are probably right, but the way things were going from the start, i didnt think that my writing and pics and all were that bad. I mean nearly all of the early comments were suggesting an 8+ which fortified my confidence in the report only to have it shot down.
Mark4: I will take your suggestions into consideration, the problem here was that I was trying to force something that wasnt there so attempting to add a plot to a game just doesnt seem as good of an idea now as it did when i hit the keyboard from the start. The more I look at the game from an objective point of veiw, i realize that it is hard to divide attention between good fanficing and good reporting, especially when the game was one such as this, so thanx for the tips.
Everyone: yeah, the game did suck, i thought i'd be able to add a good story but apparantly I failed. Next time i do a report, it will be for a decent game. most of my pics werent added for glamour or anything (cept for the early gifs) i just put htem there to make the situations a little easier to understand. That is all.

MatrisKing
#44 jhtrjiuy[79625]
24-216-14-15.hsacorp.net
your not funny.

dont try to be.
#45 mentos[79635]
mp-217-177-77.daxnet.no
i got a 7 on my report,and mine stunk :p
#46 Polock[79667]
mail.lufkinisd.org
Polock likes chicken, report is good
#47 Presto[79753]
c169604-a.alntn1.tx.home.com
omg
i casualy read br's (especialy drefsdab's reports) and no 1 ever does reg sc
U OWN MATRIS FOR DOIN 1
ITS ABOUT FUCKING TIME



Post a comment of your own here




You are not cleared to post comments, because we don't know you're not a spambot!

To comment, please Verify yourself now. [Requires cookies!]







Back to the Battle Report